Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Spanish fashion houses agree anti-anorexia 'charter'



MADRID (AFP) - Leading Spanish fashion houses including Inditex and flagship brand Zara agreed an unprecedented move to draw up a beauty "canon" including harmonising dress sizes after a recent storm over the number of young women suffering from anorexia.

The 12-point package of measures, or beauty "charter" -- drawn up with the health ministry -- includes a stipulation that shop windows display sizes of 38 minimum (size 10 in Britain, eight in the United States) and that size-46 apparel be placed in easy view in stores under the generic label "large sizes."

In a joint statement the couturiers said they intended to harmonise sizes in a bid to reduce the possibility of "consumer error" with sizes currently not in sync from one firm to the next.

Aside from Zara, other signatories included Cortefiel, Mango and chain store Corte Ingles as the Spanish firms, most of whom also sell their wares abroad, are reacting to concerns that anorexia is on the rise and that models are "excessively thin."

The charter, whose measures will be progressively introduced, aims to mark a break with showcasing models of beauty which are "impossible to reach for most people" and "can contribute to serious health disorders," such as anorexia, a health ministry statement said.

The measures are based on a biometric study of 8,500 Spanish women aged between 12 and 70 begun earlier this year, the ministry said.

Last year, Madrid's prestigious Pasarela Cibeles fashion show banned five models from participating because they did not meet World Health Organisation (WHO) weight guidelines.

A Madrid regional law aimed at fighting anorexia also ensured the five were discarded from last September's event when it emerged their body mass index (BMI), calculated on a height-weight ratio was under 18 (56 kilograms for 1.75 meters or 123 pounds for five feet eight inches).

And earlier this month, Madrid authorities this week took the fight against anorexia into cyberspace by forcing the closure of a website promoting the ideal that it's hip to be thin, after lambasting the site for publicising a competition offering would-be models prizes for losing weight.

Recent studies estimate that more than 100,000 Spanish women are anorexic and that up to half a million Spaniards suffer from various food-related disorders.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Getting Ready for MS Vist



If you're thinking of upgrading your current machine to Vista, the first thing you're going to want to do is check out your current machine to see if it's up to speed. The basic requirements call for a recent CPU, a gigabyte of RAM, and 15 gigabytes of free space on your hard drive. You're also going to want a fast graphics processor, especially if you're going to use the 3D graphics interface, Aero. But there are countless other ways that your system might not be ready for the demands of Vista.

The easiest way to find out if you've got the stuff you need to upgrade is to use the free, downloadable Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor from Microsoft's web site. When it works correctly, the Advisor goes through all of your system components, telling you what will work and what you'll have trouble with. Of course, I found out that the Advisor is not without its share of problems.

To begin with, it's equal parts sales opportunity and download advisor. As you're waiting for the software to do its scan you get lots of info-ads about Vista in all its different flavors, and you're comparison shopping before you've even done the scan. It's also a big program—a 6MB download.

I ran the Windows Upgrade Advisor on a fairly recent Dell Inspiron. It generated a list of about 15 things that needed my attention. They were broken out into three categories: system, devices, and programs.

Some of the things it pointed out were minor, like the fact that I needed updated drivers for the notebook's touchpad. Others were more critical, like the fact that I didn't have enough free disk space to do a Vista install. The scan was not happy with my VGA adapter either, which is sort of a tough one to fix since it's a notebook PC. And about half of the things it pointed out were things it reported as not having any information about in its database. Just as I was viewing the report (there's no print function), the Advisor crashed, taking my IE with it, and I had to reboot my PC. Not a great confidence builder.

I tried the Advisor on a second machine, a Dell Latitude. This time I was informed that I first needed to install a new 1.5MB version of the XML parser. The report generated told me that this machine would work best with Windows Vista Business (of course, I wanted the Home Premium). The reason it recommends the business version is because I'm running XP Professional now, and it turns out that certain upgrade paths are not available to every machine depending on the old version of Windows you're running. ExtremeTech has a nice chart showing you which upgrade paths will work and which ones won't.

In addition to recommending Windows Vista Business Edition, the report indicated that while my CPU and hard disk were fine, the Advisor had no information about the compatibility of my graphics system (Intel 82852) or my Sigma Tel Audio, to name a few. It found five programs that needed minor updates, including MS Explorer and Java. The advice was to head to Windows Update and start getting my devices and programs more up to date.

So far, I can't say I'm enamored with the Windows Upgrade Advisor. Both machines need some work to get them in shape for the big day, and I'm more and more serious about just buying a new Vista machine and starting life fresh on January 30th.

Monday, January 22, 2007

U.S. drivers eat, shave, email and drive

CINCINNATI, Jan 22 (Reuters Life!) - Talk on the phone while you're driving? Fix your makeup? Check e-mail? You're not alone.

A survey released on Monday shows 81 percent of Americans do more than drive when they're behind the wheel.

More than eight of 10 people surveyed by Nationwide Mutual Insurance said they adjust the radio or music while they drive, while 73 percent talk on the phone, 68 percent eat, 19 percent send text messages and 5 percent checked their e-mail.

Personal hygiene was also a big driver distraction, with 19 percent fixing their hair, 12 percent putting on makeup and 2 percent shaving while at the controls of a car.

"Clearly Americans have much to do and little time to do it, so to cope with that we've become multi-taskers," said Bill Windsor, associate vice president of Safety at Nationwide.

"The problem with that is driving requires focus, and multi-tasking while driving puts you and your fellow drivers at risk."

Drivers in the survey also admitted to changing seats with passengers, watching a movie, painting their toenails, nursing a baby and putting in contact lenses while driving.

Younger drivers multi-task the most, the survey found, with 35 percent of 18-to-27 year olds saying they always multi-task in the car, compared to 21 percent of baby boomers.

Windsor said the consequences for young drivers are severe, with car accidents being the number one cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 27.

"The bottom line is if it can be done in the kitchen, bathroom, office or bedroom, it should not be done in the car," Windsor said.

While some U.S. jurisdictions require hands-free devices for cellphone use in cars, most of the activities listed in the survey are not illegal unless they are determined to be the cause of an accident.

The survey of 1,200 drivers between the ages of 18 and 60 found that while 83 percent believe they are safe drivers, 38 percent admitted they have driven a certain distance without any recollection of doing so.

Sandra Guile, spokeswoman for AAA in Cincinnati, said the automobile club's driving instructors have seen it all, and work hard to try to correct the bad habits.

"Imagine if you're going 55 miles an hour down the road and you spill something on your suit and you have a meeting that day -- you're going to be more worried about grabbing a napkin than watching the road," said Guile. "But it just takes a split second to look away and there's an accident."

Cincinnati professor Penny Braboy said that while she never eats or makes phone calls while driving, she does answer the phone if it rings -- and she admits to other distractions.

"I have put on lipstick in the car," Braboy, 55, said with a laugh. "And I might try to look for something in my purse, which I know is dangerous."

But she said her distractions have never caused an accident.

"I try to be careful," said she, getting into her sport utility vehicle, Starbucks coffee in hand.

Antarctic explorer makes final return


WELLINGTON, New Zealand - Everest conqueror and Antarctic explorer Sir Edmund Hillary has returned to the frozen continent — at age 87 — for what he believes will be his last time.

Hillary joined New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark and other dignitaries who flew to Antarctica for the 50th anniversary of the Scott Base, which the adventurer helped build in 1957.

"This is probably the last opportunity that I will get to visit the wintery south," Hillary said Friday, the day after he arrived.

Hillary helped lead a team to the South Pole in 1955. He was the first person to drive to the pole, using a modified farm tractor.

The trip came two years after Hillary and sherpa Tenzing Norgay became the first people to climb Mount Everest , the world's tallest peak.

Hillary, who still travels widely to Nepal and elsewhere, last visited Antarctica two years ago.

"I was always prepared to come back one more time," said Hillary, whose comments were reported by New Zealand media traveling with the anniversary delegation. "I don't think it'll ever happen again, but this is a marvelous return."

Hillary criticized Japan for its policies allowing whaling for scientific purposes, and for pushing to revoke the international ban on commercial hunting. The Japanese whale hunting season began recently in waters at the far south of the world.

"They just don't seem to have accepted that these creatures, wonderful creatures that they are, should be carefully protected," Hillary said.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070121/ap_on_re_au_an/antarctica_hillary_7

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Mobile risks 'need further study'


Child using a mobile phone
The government warns against excessive mobile use


A radiation expert is calling for more research into the long-term health effects of using mobile phones.

Lawrence Challis, chairman of the Mobile Telecommunications Health Research Programme (MTHR), said it was "responsible" to study long-term users.

Professor Challis is seeking Department of Health funding to study 200,000 mobile phone users over a decade.

He said there was a "hint of something" suggesting a link between mobiles and ill health but no hard evidence.

'Dilemma'

Prof Challis, a physicist, said short-term studies had established no risk but added that volunteers should be looked at over a period of at least five years.

He is negotiating with the Department of Health and the mobile phone industry - which jointly fund the MTHR - for £3m extra to carry out more research.

We know from smoking and with the bomb falling in Hiroshima that nothing was seen for 10 years
Professor Lawrence Challis

Prof Challis told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "The situation at the moment is that we have no evidence of any harm from mobile phones.

"The dilemma is the time that it takes for a disease to appear.

"We know from smoking and with the bomb falling in Hiroshima that nothing was seen for 10 years."

He added: "The responsible thing to do is to continue monitoring."

Most of the volunteers taking part in the study will have used mobile phones for about 10 years, Professor Challis said.

Research published last year suggested no evidence that mobile phone users had a higher risk of tumours in the brain, eye, or salivary gland, or leukaemia.

The Danish Institute of Cancer Epidemiology in Copenhagen, looked at data on more than 56,000 people who had been using the devices for at least 10 years.

But Prof Challis advised caution, saying: "I certainly don't want my grandchildren to start using mobile phones until they are at secondary school.

"Children may be more vulnerable, so we need to protect them.

"My balanced view is keep them off of them until they get to secondary school but encourage them to text as much as possible. That gives them much less exposure."

The government advises mobile phone users - of which there are more than one billion worldwide - to keep their call times short.

MySpace developing parental notification

A screenshot of MySpace.com, taken on January 17, 2007. MySpace.com, News Corp.'s popular online social network, plans to offer free parental notification software in a bid to appease government critics, The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.


By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer Wed Jan 17, 6:41 PM ET

NEW YORK - The popular online hangout MySpace.com has been quietly developing software designed to give parents the bare-bones of what their kids are doing on the site.

The tool, which will alert parents of the username, age and location a child lists on personal MySpace pages known as profiles, is designed to spark conversations about Internet safety.

But it is also meant to give kids enough room to maneuver lest they flee to rival social-networking sites such as Facebook or Xanga. Unlike third-party monitoring software available for sale, the free MySpace tool won't let parents see their kids' password-protected profiles or any communications they have with friends.

MySpace, which announced the initiative Wednesday after The Wall Street Journal reported on its existence, expects the software now known as "Zephyr" will be available this summer.

Parents, school administrators and law-enforcement authorities have been increasingly warning of online predators at sites like MySpace, whose youth-oriented visitors are encouraged to expand their circles of friends through messaging tools and personal profile pages.

News Corp.'s MySpace has responded by expanding educational efforts and partnerships with law enforcement. It also adopted new restrictions on how adults may contact the site's younger users and has helped design tools for identifying profiles .

Hemanshu Nigam, MySpace's chief security officer, described the latest initiative as a way for parents to learn whether their child is using MySpace from a home computer — as most who have MySpace profiles do — and whether the listed age is truthful.

Under MySpace's current policies, children under 14 are banned and those 14 or 15 years old can display their full profiles — containing hobbies, schools and any other personal details — only to people already on the teen's list of friends. Others see only the bare-bones profile, listing username, gender, age and location.

But MySpace relies on users to specify their age. With the software, parents could tell if a 14-year-old tries to get full profile access by pretending to be 18.

"Many of our safety features are built around age and it's important that people honestly reflect their accurate age while on our site," Nigam said in a statement.

The software also would be able to detect whether a teen has multiple profiles — one to show parents, another for friends — and once the teen accesses a profile from a home computer, parents would likely be notified if the teen tries to change it from a friend's house. Specific mechanisms still are being worked out.

But the tool won't work if a profile is accessed entirely away from home.

Parry Aftab, executive director of WiredSafety.org, praised MySpace for its plans to let kids know when such software is installed, saying it could help trigger dialogue with parents.

But she said the tools might drive kids elsewhere, even though the software won't reveal more than what's available on their public profiles.

"A lot of kids think that somehow MySpace is their private space," she said, "and when they find out their teacher, police or parents are reading their profiles, they leave in droves."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070117/ap_on_hi_te/myspace_safety


Numbers behind Windows 95, Vista



Some numbers behind Microsoft Corp.'s evolution from Windows 95 to this month's consumer release of Windows Vista:

Common retail price for Windows 95: $89.95

For Vista: Depends on user configuration. Upgrading a PC from Windows XP would cost as little as $99 for Vista Home Basic edition, up to $259 for Vista Ultimate. Suggested retail prices for those versions range from $199 to $399.

Number of lines of code in Windows 95: 11.2 million

In Vista: 50 million is a commonly cited figure, but Microsoft refuses to confirm that officially.

Approximate number of Windows 95 programmers: 200

For Vista: More than 2,000, according to one Microsoft developer's blog, but Microsoft also won't confirm that.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070119/ap_on_hi_te/windows_glance

Monday, January 15, 2007

'Tweens' are fast becoming the new teens



Zach Plante is close with his parents — he plays baseball with them and, on weekends, helps with work in the small vineyard they keep at their northern California home.

things, he's announced that he wants to grow his hair longer — and sometimes greets his father with "Yo, Dad!"

"Little comments will come out of his mouth that have a bit of that teen swagger," says Tom Plante, Zach's dad.

Thing is, Zach isn't a teen. He's 10 years old — one part, a fun-loving fifth-grader who likes to watch the Animal Planet network and play with his dog and pet gecko, the other a soon-to-be middle schooler who wants an iPod.

In some ways, it's simply part of a kid's natural journey toward independence. But child development experts say that physical and behavioral changes that would have been typical of teenagers decades ago are now common among "tweens" — kids ages 8 to 12.

Some of them are going on "dates" and talking on their own cell phones. They listen to bad charged pop music, play mature-rated video games and spend time gossiping on MySpace. And more girls are wearing makeup and clothing that some consider beyond their years.

Zach is starting to notice it in his friends, too, especially the way they treat their parents.

"A lot of kids can sometimes be annoyed by their parents," he says. "If I'm playing with them at one of their houses, then they kind of ignore their parents. If their parents do them a favor, they might just say, 'OK,' but not notice that much."

The shift that's turning tweens into the new teens is complex — and worrisome to parents and some professionals who deal with children. They wonder if kids are equipped to handle the thorny issues that come with the adolescent world.

"I'm sure this isn't the first time in history people have been talking about it. But I definitely feel like these kids are growing up faster — and I'm not sure it's always a good thing," says Dr. Liz Alderman, an adolescent medicine specialist at Montefiore Medical Center in New York City. She's been in practice for 16 years and has noticed a gradual but undeniable change in attitude in that time.

She and others who study and treat children say the reasons it's happening are both physical and social.

Several published studies have found, for instance, that some tweens' bodies are developing faster, a result doctors often attribute to improved nutrition.

Along with that, even young children are having to deal with peer pressure and other societal influences.

Beyond the drugs, rock'n'roll their boomer and Gen X parents navigated, technology and consumerism have accelerated the pace of life, giving kids easy access to influences that may or may not be parent-approved. violence and foul language that used to be relegated to late-night viewing and R-rated movies are expected fixtures in everyday TV.

And many tweens model what they see, including common plot lines "where the kids are really running the house, not the dysfunctional parents," says Plante, who in addition to being Zach's dad is a psychology professor at Santa Clara University in California's Silicon Valley.

He sees the results of all these factors in his private practice frequently.

Kids look and dress older. They struggle to process the images of violence and adult humor, even when their parents try to shield them. And sometimes, he says, parents end up encouraging the behavior by failing to set limits — in essence, handing over power to their kids.

"You get this kind of perfect storm of variables that would suggest that, yes, kids are becoming teens at an earlier age," Plante says.

Natalie Wickstrom, a 10-year-old in suburban Atlanta, says girls her age sometimes wear clothes that are "a little inappropriate." She describes how one friend tied her shirt to show her stomach and "liked to dance, like in rap videos."

Girls in her class also talk about not only liking but "having relationships" with boys.

"There's no rules, no limitations to what they can do," says Natalie, who's also in fifth grade.

Her mom, Billie Wickstrom, says the teen-like behavior of her daughter's peers, influences her daughter — as does parents' willingness to allow it.

"Some parents make it hard on those of us who are trying to hold their kids back a bit," she says.

So far, she and her husband have resisted letting Natalie get her ears pierced, something many of her friends have already done. Now Natalie is lobbying hard for a cell phone and also wants an iPod.

"Sometimes I just think that maybe, if I got one of these things, I could talk about what they talk about," Natalie says of the kids she deems the "popular ones."

It's an age-old issue. Kids want to fit in — and younger kids want to be like older kids.

But as the limits have been pushed — with parents and tweens having to deal with very grown-up issues such as pregnancy transmitted diseases. Earlier this year, that point hit home when federal officials recommended a vaccine for HPV — a common STD that can lead to cervical cancer — for girls as young as age 9.

"Physically, they're adults, but cognitively, they're children," says Alderman, the physician in New York. She's found that cultural influences have affected her own children, too.

"I mean, it's OK to have that conversation, but when it's constantly playing, it normalizes it," Alderman says.

She observes that parents sometimes gravitate to one of two ill-advised extremes — they're either horrified by such questions from their kids, or they "revel" in the teen-like behavior. As an example of the latter reaction, she notes how some parents think it's cute when their daughters wear pants or shorts with words such as "hottie" on the back.

"Believe me, I'm a very open-minded person. But it promotes a certain way of thinking about girls and their back sides," Alderman says.

With grown-up influences coming from so many different angles — from peers to the Internet and TV — some parents say the trend is difficult to combat.

Claire Unterseher, a mother in Chicago, says she only allows her children — including an 8-year-old son and 7-year-old daughter — to watch public television.

And yet, already, they're coming home from school asking to download songs she considers more appropriate for teens.

"I think I bought my first Abba single when I was 13 or 14 — and here my 7-year-old wants me to download Kelly Clarkson all the time," Unterseher says. "Why are they so interested in all this adult stuff?"

Part of it, experts say, is marketing — and tweens are much-sought-after consumers.

Advertisers have found that, increasingly, children and teens are influencing the buying decisions in their households — from cars to computers and family vacations. According to 360 Youth, an umbrella organization for various youth marketing groups, tweens represent $51 billion worth of annual spending power on their own from gifts and allowance, and also have a great deal of say about the additional $170 billion spent directly on them each year.

Toymakers also have picked up on tweens' interest in older themes and developed toy lines to meet the demand — from dolls known as Bratz to video games with more violence.

Diane Levin, a professor of human development and early childhood at Wheelock College in Boston, is among those who've taken aim at toys deemed too violent.

"We've crossed a line. We can no longer avoid it — it's just so in our face," says Levin.

Earlier this year, she and others from a group known as the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood successfully pressured toy maker Hasbro to drop plans for a line of children's toys modeled after the singing group Pussycat Dolls.

Other parents, including Clyde Otis III, are trying their own methods.

An attorney with a background in music publishing, Otis has compiled a line of CDs called "Music Talking" that includes classic oldies he believes are interesting to tweens, but age appropriate. Artists include Aretha Franklin, Rose Royce and Blessid Union of Souls.

"I don't want to be like a prude. But some of the stuff out there, it's just out of control sometimes," says Otis, a father of three from Maplewood, N.J.

"Beyonce singing -about bad meaning- lyrics all over the place is a little much — at least for an 8-year-old."

In the end, many parents find it tricky to strike a balance between setting limits and allowing their kids to be more independent.

Plante, in California, discovered that a few weeks ago when he and Zach rode bikes to school, as the two of them have done since the first day of kindergarten.

"You know, dad, you don't have to bike to school with me anymore," Zach said.

Plante was taken aback.

"It was a poignant moment," he says. "There was this notion of being embarrassed of having parents be too close."

Since then, Zach has been riding by himself — a big step in his dad's mind.

"Of course, it is hard to let go, but we all need to do so in various ways over time," Plante says, "as long as we do it thoughtfully and lovingly, I suppose."

Copied from Yahoo! News
N.B: Some inappropriate Sentences (words) Are Removed, the purpose here is just to inform people with this news.

Five to do...Tips from Al Gore

"An Inconvenient Truth"
Al Gore on Oprah's Show

Al Gore shops at Lowe's.

You are not helpless in the fight against global warming. Gore goes inside a Lowe's Home Improvement store outside Nashville, Tennessee, to show you the five things you can buy that will help solve the climate crisis…and save you a few bucks!

Compact fluorescent light bulbs: These energy-efficient bulbs cost less than $4 and are produced by major corporations like GE. If every household in America switched five regular light bulbs for five fluorescent bulbs, it would be the equivalent of taking 1 million cars off the highways for a full year.

Outdoor solar lighting: These yard or patio lights cost less than $20, and they don't burn any electricity or produce any CO2.

Programmable thermostats: Though these thermostats cost from $50 to $100, they can actually cut your heating and cooling costs. Set the setting so it's a little bit cooler in the winter and warmer in the summer when you're not in the house. A difference of 2 degrees can reduce a home's CO2 emissions by up to 9 percent over the course of a year.

Air filters: Changing the air filters in your heating and cooling systems regularly can knock 2 percent off of your CO2 output each year.

Electric hot water heater blanket: Hot water heaters use a lot of energy and generate a lot of CO2. A blanket costs less than $18 and can cut your home's CO2 emissions by almost 4 1/2 percent.

Gore says that when you're shopping for major home appliances, look for the Energy Star label. "This is a signal that you're getting an environmentally efficient appliance that's going to save you money at the same time," he says.

http://www2.oprah.com/tows/pastshows/200612/tows_past_20061205.jhtml

An Inconvenient Truth

Is "An Inconvenient Truth" a convenient lie?



Let's see what the movie trailer says....

"If you love your children"
"If you love your planet"
"You must see this film"


they use GUILT to manipulate you - who doesn't love their children? who doesn't love the Earth?

"the most terrifying film you will ever see"

They use fear and anxiety to manipulate you - to SCARE you into acting or feeling a certain way. why?

"The scientific consensus is that WE are causing global warming"

Oh really? what scientists said that? how are you the cause of the problem? because you own a car? because you use electricity? because you want to heat your home in the winter? or just because you eat and breathe? for this you should be held accountable for the problems of the world ? read on....

"This is not a political issue...so much as it is a moral issue"

it most certainly is a political issue AND a moral issue. But YOUR morals are not the problem. Yes, there are increasing temperatures. Yes, there are more violent storms. Yes, our environment is in trouble.

"Did the planet betray us... or did we betray the planet?"

It is YOU who is being betrayed. .

"We have to act together to solve this crisis"

Yes we do.... but not in the way that the producers of this movie would like you to.

Ask yourself these questions:

If you could own a car that got 200 mpg, made no pollution, performed as well as a normal car, and did not cost a lot, would you one one?

Did you know that in 1930 Charles Nelson Pogue invented modified carburetor that did just that? Did you know that since then there have been over 5,000 patents for high-efficiency fuel systems and engines? It is now 76 years later. We have supercomputers and spacecraft. How many mpg does your car get?

If you could have all the electricity and heat you want for FREE, without making any pollution or greenhouse gasses, without fossil or nuclear fuels, would you do it?

Did you know that there are HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of patents for engines and electrical generating devices that make no pollution, no greenhouse gases, run on magnets, or gravity, or water, or absorb energy from the air or the Earth?

Why are we still using fossil and nuclear fuels?

Who would want suppress technology that would benefit everyone? Who stands to profit? Who has the power pull off such a massive cover-up? And why are they blaming YOU for pollution? And why doesn't Mr. Al Gore talk about this?

But wait! There's more.....

The movie blames pollution for increasingly violent storms. Yes there are increasingly violent storms. But is that due to pollution? What about the magnetic pole shifts? What about the past two Ice ages and the Great Flood described in the Bible? I suppose wooly mammoths caused that? Did you know that weather control technology has been around for over 40 years? Back in the 70's it was reported in the news all the time about "seeding clouds" to increase rainfall. Did you know that there is a 3,600,000-watt radio transmitter in Alaska called HAARP (High frequency Active Auroral Research Program) that can pump energy into the atmosphere anywhere on the planet? did you know that it can be used to alter weather patterns? did you know that this technology can weaken storms? did you know that it can make them worse? Could the Hurricane Katrina disaster have been avoided? was it created? who would do such a thing?

but wait! it gets worse...

Not only do the perpetrators of this cover-up want to suppress this technology, but they want to blame YOU for polluting the Earth. And what solution do they offer? Let's see....

They say that WE pollute the air. They say WE should have tougher laws that will restrict our use of energy and transportation. that means electricity and fuel will be rationed. It means curfews. Road blocks. it means being imprisoned for trying to heat your home. All in the name of saving the environment.

They say that WE pollute the land and water. They say WE should have tougher laws that will restrict our use of it. that means not being able to grow food. that means water rationing. that means being forced to live where they tell you. all in the name of saving the environment. THIS IS ALREADY HAPPENING all across America.

They say national governments are too lenient on environmental issues. They say that WE must yield to a worldwide government that will control the worlds land and water, food and energy. All in the name of saving the environment.

And finally, they say that the Earth can not sustain population growth. They would like you to feel guilty just for being alive. They say that "something" must be done to reduce the population but they don't say what. all in the name of saving the environment.

So. let's see....

They want to overthrow our government, take our land, control our food, water, energy, and transportation, imprison us, and eventually kill us. And they want us to trust them.

Who are "they"? Big corporations? Big oil? The Federal Reserve? The New World Order? The United Nations? Maybe. But whoever they are, they financed this very well-produced and cleverly scripted movie and placed Al Gore as their front man. Start asking questions.




This article is copied from this link
http://www.agenturus.org/myspace/inconvenienttruth.htm